Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0103/07 (ATP Bioluminescence/MILLIPORE) 25-03-2010
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0103/07 (ATP Bioluminescence/MILLIPORE) 25-03-2010

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T010307.20100325
Date of decision
25 March 2010
Case number
T 0103/07
Petition for review of
-
Application number
00930821.4
IPC class
C12N 1/06
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 79.24 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Method for rapidly detecting and enumerating microorganisms in mammalian cell preparations using ATP bioluminescence

Applicant name
MILLIPORE CORPORATION
Opponent name
-
Board
3.3.08
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
Keywords

Main request: inventive step (no)

Auxiliary request: inventive step (yes)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0010/93
Citing decisions
-

I. The applicant (appellant) lodged an appeal against the decision of the examining division dated 29 June 2006, whereby European patent application No. 00 930 821.4 with publication number 1 185 616 was refused. The application, entitled "Method for rapidly detecting and enumerating microorganisms in mammalian cell preparations using ATP bioluminescence", originated from an international application published as WO 00/71675.

II. The decision was based on the main and the four auxiliary requests filed on 15 February 2006 which were refused for reasons of lack of an inventive step (Article 56 EPC 1973) in view of documents D1 and D3 (see Section VIII infra).

III. On 2 November 2006, the appellant filed a statement setting out the grounds of appeal together with two new documents.

IV. The examining division did not rectify its decision and referred the appeal to the board of appeal (Article 109 EPC 1973).

V. On 29 October 2009, the board issued a summons to oral proceedings which was accompanied by a communication pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) containing the board's provisional and non-binding opinion on substantive matters. With reference to decision G 10/93 (OJ EPO, 1995, 172), the board announced that, using its power to examine whether a requirement of the EPC which the examining division did not take into consideration in the examining proceedings was met, it was intended to assess whether the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC and Articles 83 and 84 EPC 1973 were complied with. Furthermore, a new prior art document (see document D4 in Section VIII infra) was introduced by the board into the proceedings.

VI. Together with a letter dated 24 February 2010, in reply to the board's communication, the appellant filed a new main request and five new auxiliary requests to replace the requests then on file. Additional examples were annexed to the appellant's letter.

VII. Oral proceedings took place on 25 March 2010, at which the requests of 24 February 2010 were withdrawn and a new main request as a well as a new auxiliary request were filed.

(a) The main request

The main request consisted of 9 claims, of which claim 1 read as follows:

"1. A method for the detection of microorganisms in a mammalian cell preparation from a mammalian cell fermenter, the cell preparation including mammalian cells having a level of mammalian ATP, wherein the method includes the sequential steps of:

reducing the level of mammalian ATP in said cell preparation by differentially lyzing said mammalian cells with one or more detergents to extract said mammalian ATP;

treating said extracted mammalian ATP with one or more ATP hydrolysing enzymes;

incubating said cell preparation for 15 minutes at room temperature while preserving the viability of the microorganisms;

filtering said mammalian cell preparation through a micropartitioned hydrophilic/hydrophobic membrane made up of a number of hydrophilic filter sections substantially completely isolated from each other with latticed or circular hydrophobic micropartitions to immobilise said microorganisms;

washing away said detergent and said hydrolysing enzyme on said membrane;

extracting microbial ATP from the immobilised microorganisms using an extracting agent;

applying a bioluminescent reagent onto said membrane; and

detecting light emitted by said microbial ATP to indicate the presence and number of said microorganisms in said cell preparation."

(b) The auxiliary request

The auxiliary request consisted of 8 claims of which claim 1 read as follows:

"1. A method for the detection of microorganisms in a mammalian cell preparation from a mammalian cell fermenter, the cell preparation including mammalian cells having a level of mammalian ATP, wherein the method includes the sequential steps of:

reducing the level of mammalian ATP in said cell preparation by differentially lyzing said mammalian cells with osmotic shock and one or more detergents to extract said mammalian ATP;

treating said extracted mammalian ATP with one or more ATP hydrolysing enzymes;

incubating said cell preparation for 15 minutes at room temperature while preserving the viability of the microorganisms;

filtering said mammalian cell preparation through a micropartitioned hydrophilic/hydrophobic membrane made up of a number of hydrophilic filter sections substantially completely isolated from each other with latticed or circular hydrophobic micropartitions to immobilise said microorganisms;

washing away said detergent and said hydrolysing enzyme on said membrane;

extracting microbial ATP from the immobilised microorganisms using an extracting agent;

applying a bioluminescent reagent onto said membrane; and

detecting light emitted by said microbial ATP to indicate the presence and number of said microorganisms in said cell preparation."

(emphasis added by the board)

Claims 2 to 8 were dependent on claim 1 and were directed to particular embodiments thereof.

VIII. The following documents are referred to in the present decision:

(D1) P. E. Stanley, Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 133, 1986, pages 14 to 22;

(D3) H. Tanaka et al., Wat. Res., Vol. 31, No. 8, 1997, pages 1913 to 1918;

(D4) E. W. Chappelle et al., Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 57, 1978, pages 65 to 72.

IX. The submissions made by the appellant, insofar as they are relevant to the present decision, may be summarised as follows:

Main request

Article 56 EPC 1973

The method according to claim 1 included a non-obvious step of opening or lysing the mammalian cell preparation by the way of a differential extraction which did not damage the contaminant microorganisms. Furthermore, use was made of a particular membrane which was found to be especially useful to immobilise the microorganisms efficiently and without damage, and which, at the same time, allowed to wash away the detergents and the freed ATP before microbial ATP was extracted and measured.

Document D1 was silent as to the type of membrane to be used and did not suggest that the microorganisms should be immobilised thereon. Nor did it indicate that the cell preparation should be incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature after treatment with the ATP hydrolysing enzyme, an incubation which had been found to be critical to allow time for the hydrolysing enzyme to break down the ATP from the mammalian cells in the sample while not affecting bacterial cell viability.

Document D1 did not disclose that the somatic cells were derived from a fermenter and therefore did not address the technical problem of the invention. It taught about extracting specifically somatic cells but did not go on to say that, having done so and having hydrolysed the mammalian ATP, the somatic cells and the mammalian ATP should be washed away.

Document D1 was a publication of 1986, pooling together a number of ideas under a common heading. It was not directed at detecting and measuring microorganisms in the presence of somatic cells.

Document D3 was not concerned with reducing the level of ATP derived from mammalian cells and removing it therefrom.

Document D4 did not disclose whether or not the filtering would damage the microorganisms.

Auxiliary request

Article 56 EPC 1973

Whereas osmotic shock was known to be efficient at opening or lysing mammalian cells, there was no suggestion in the available state of the art of using in combination an osmotic shock and one or more detergents to lyse mammalian cells. Example DD, as submitted with the letter of 24 February 2010, showed that the combined use of an osmotic shock and of one or more detergents was associated with an unexpected improved detection of microorganisms in comparison with the use of either an osmotic shock or a detergent alone.

X. The appellant requests that the decision under appeal be set aside and that a patent be granted on the basis of the main request or the auxiliary request, both filed during the oral proceedings.

Main request

Admission into the proceedings

1. Since the main request was filed in direct reaction to objections under Article 84 EPC 1973 raised by the board at the oral proceedings against the appellant's previous main request of 24 February 2010, the board using its discretionary power under Article 13(1) RPBA decided to admit it into the proceedings.

Formal and substantive requirements of the main request

2. The subject-matter of the main request is basically derived from a combination of the claims on which the decision under appeal was based. No objections other than lack of inventive step were raised by the examining division nor does the board, after having considered the appellant's observations and arguments, see any reason to raise any of its own (see also points 18 and 19 infra).

Requirements of Article 56 EPC 1973

3. Claim 1 of the main request is directed to a method for the detection of microorganisms which may contaminate mammalian cells in a fermenter. As explained on page 2, lines 1 to 3, of the application as published (see WO 00/71675), an object of the invention was to provide a highly sensitive method for the detection of low levels of contaminating microorganisms.

4. D1 is a prior art document cited in the supplementary European Search Report and correctly considered by the examining division in the decision under appeal to represent the closest state of the art. Document D1 deals with the issue of how extracting adenosine triphosphate (ATP) from microbial and somatic cells, and provides guidance to determine microbial ATP contained in mixtures of somatic and microbial cells, with one approach consisting in selectively extracting the somatic cells of the mixture using a detergent such as Triton X-100 and then hydrolysing the somatic ATP together with any free ATP with an ATPase (see on page 21 the Section entitled "Somatic and Microbial Cells Mixed Together with Nonliving Material"). For a more detailed description of that approach, document D1 directs the reader to its reference 43 which is document D4 in the present appeal proceedings (see the number 43 put after the term ATPase in the second paragraph of page 21).

5. Prior art document D4 investigates the determination of bacterial content in fluids using the bioluminescence-based firefly luciferase ATP assay. Factors, including interference by nonbacterial ATP in the sample, that influence the accuracy of the measurement, and assay methods, including filtration procedures, are addressed.

5.1 On page 68, it is stated that nonbacterial ATP in the sample, including intracellular ATP from eukaryotic cells, must be removed prior to bacterial ATP extraction and assay, the removal comprising in a preferred embodiment a selective chemical lysis of nonbacterial cells by using a detergent such as Triton X-100 followed by the addition of an ATPase to hydrolyse the freed ATP.

5.2 On page 72, an assay is described which incorporates such a treatment. The mammalian cells contained in a sample fluid, which passes readily through a filter with minimal damage to the bacteria, are lysed by adding to the sample an amount of Triton X-100 (also denoted "TX" in the document, see page 71, third line) and an active ATP-hydrolysing enzyme solution (known as "apyrase"; see the paragraph beginning with the term "Apyrase" on page 70). The sample is incubated 15 minutes for ATP hydrolysis, filtered on a 0,22 mym membrane and washed. The filter is then treated with an extracting agent to remove bacterial ATP from the bacteria retained on its surface. The extract is collected as filtrate, an aliquot of which is assayed by injection of a luciferase enzyme preparation (see page 72, first three paragraphs).

6. The board observes that document D1, taken together with document D4 which is one of its own citations, describes a method for the detection of microorganisms in a sample from which the method according to claim 1 differs only in that a particular membrane is used.

7. Thus, the technical problem faced by the skilled person may be seen as the provision of an alternative sensitive method for the detection of low levels of microorganisms contained in a mammalian cell fermenter (see page 2, lines 1 to 3 of the published application). The solution to that problem is a method according to claim 1 in which the filtration is carried out through a micropartitioned hydrophilic/hydrophobic membrane made up of a number of hydrophilic filter sections substantially completely isolated from each other with latticed or circular hydrophobic micropartitions to immobilise said microorganisms.

8. The question to be answered for the assessment of inventive step is whether the skilled person would have found an incentive in any of the available prior art documents to replace in the method of document D1, as detailed in document D4, the 0,22 mym membrane by a membrane as that disclosed in the application.

9. Prior art document D3 would not have escaped the attention of the skilled person faced with the underlying technical problem because it dealt with the problem of designing a sensitive method which can be used to detect low concentrations of microorganisms.

10. The method of document D3 relies on the use of a special membrane of the type referred to in claim 1. This membrane makes possible a low concentration of microorganisms in the samples on the surface, the dispersal of the microorganisms uniformly and the prevention of the microbial ATP from spreading and diluting (see in the left-hand column of page 1914, the paragraph entitled "RMD membrane filter" and the legend of Figure 1). This method can be used to detect low concentration of microorganisms (see lines 13 to 17 in the right-hand column of page 1914).

11. It is not doubtful that the skilled person would have readily realised that the membrane described in document D3 qualifies as a filter appropriate to the detection of low concentrations of microorganisms and would have used it in place of the 0,22 mym membrane used in the method of document D4, thereby arriving at the method according to claim 1.

12. The appellant argued that document D3 was not relevant for the reason that it was not concerned with a method that included the reduction of mammalian ATP contained in a mixture of mammalian cells contaminated with microorganisms. However, this is not the point at issue. The high relevancy of document D3 in the present assessment of inventive step lies indeed in the disclosure of the remarkable ability of the particular membrane referred to therein, directly linked to its structure, of allowing a low concentration of microorganisms to be spread homogenously on its surface and, thereby, allowing also an accurate detection of the same. Thus, the appellant's argument is not tenable.

13. Equally untenable is the appellant's argument that document D1 is not relevant for the reason that the mixture of somatic cells and microbial cells as referred to on page 21 does not specifically include a mixture as contained in a mammalian cell fermenter, i.e. mammalian cells contaminated with microorganisms. Indeed, the non-exhausted list of cell mixtures referred to at the top of page 21 includes mixtures, such as rumen contents and clinical samples, which comprise mammalian cells contaminated with microorganisms and therefore do not differ substantially from the mammalian cell preparation referred to in claim 1. No inventive contribution can be associated with the selection of a mammalian cell preparation from a mammalian cell fermenter. Nor is this selection emphasised in the application as providing any particular advantageous effect.

14. The further argument, that in the method of document D4 keeping undamaged the microorganisms was not an issue, was contradicted by the indication made in the first paragraph on page 72 of that document, wherein it is stated that the sample was passed through a filter "with minimal damage".

15. Also the appellant's argument that an incubation of 15 minutes was unexpectedly found to be advantageous to allow the ATP hydrolysing enzyme(s) to hydrolyse the mammalian ATP, is invalidated by the description in document D4 of such an incubation (see third paragraph on page 72).

16. Thus, the board concludes that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request does not involve an inventive step and that, therefore, it does not comply with Article 56 EPC 1973 and, as a result thereof, the main request can not form a basis for the maintenance of the patent in amended form.

Auxiliary request

Admission into the proceedings

17. Since the auxiliary request was filed in direct reaction to objections under Article 56 EPC 1973 raised by the board against the appellant's main request, the board using its discretionary power under Article 13(1) RPBA decided to admit it into the proceedings.

Requirements of Article 123(2) EPC

18. Support can be found for the method according to claim 1 on page 5, lines 3 to 16 and 20 to 30 taken together with page 1, lines 8 to 14 (for the feature mammalian cell fermenters) of the application as published (WO 00/71675, the content of which correspond to that of the application as filed), with the lysis step (involving an osmotic shock combined with the use of one or more detergents) being specifically described inter alia on page 5, at line 14. The additional features contained in the dependent claims are described inter alia on page 5, lines 16 to 19 (see claim 2); page 6, lines 6 to 7 (see claim 3); page 6, lines 13 to 16 (see claim 4); page 6, lines 3 to 5 (see claim 5); page 6, lines 17 to 18 (see claim 6); page 6, lines 7 to 13 (see claim 7) and page 5, lines 7 to 8 (see claim 8). Thus, the auxiliary request as a whole complies with the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC.

Requirements of Articles 84 and 83 EPC 1973

19. The board is satisfied that the claims of the auxiliary request complies with the requirements of Article 84 EPC 1973. Furthermore, it considers that the description as a whole including Examples A to D on pages 6 to 7 would provide the skilled person with all the necessary guidance to carry out the method according to claim 1 or of any one of dependent claims 2 to 8. It is noted that Example D on page 7 describes a differential lysis of mammalian cells with osmotic shock (with MilliQ Water) and two detergents (Triton X-100 and SDS). Thus, the requirements of Article 83 EPC 1973 are also met.

Requirements of Article 56 EPC 1973

20. Claim 1 of the auxiliary request differs from claim 1 of the main request in that the lyse of the mammalian cells is not obtained by the only effect of one or more detergents but by the same combined with an osmotic shock (see Section VII, supra).

21. None of the available prior art describes the use of an osmotic shock for lysing mammalian cells, let alone in combination with one or more detergents. Furthermore, the results of Example DD, as submitted with the letter of 24 February 2010 (see pages 16 and 17 thereof), show an unexpected higher detection of the contaminating microorganisms when one or two detergents are used in combination with an osmotic shock compared to the detection of the same when the lysis is obtained upon either an osmotic shock or the action of one or more detergents alone.

22. Taking document D1 as the closest state of the art (see points 4 to 6 supra), the technical problem to be solved may be seen as the provision of an alternative sensitive method for the detection of low levels of microorganisms contained in a mammalian cell fermenter (see page 2, lines 1 to 3). The solution to that problem is a method according to claim 1 in which (i) the differential lyse of the mammalian cells is obtained by the combined effect of one or more detergents and of an osmotic shock, and (ii) the filtration is carried out through a micropartitioned hydrophilic/hydrophobic membrane made up of a number of hydrophilic filter sections substantially completely isolated from each other with latticed or circular hydrophobic micropartitions to immobilise said microorganisms.

23. The question to be answered for the assessment of inventive step is whether the skilled person would have found an incentive in any of the available prior art documents to replace in the method of document D1, as detailed in document D4, the 0,22 mym membrane by a membrane as that disclosed in the application and to carry out the differential lysis by adding an osmotic shock to the detergents used.

24. It is not doubtful that, for the reasons explained in point 9 supra, the skilled person would have readily realised, as already acknowledged in point 10 supra, that the membrane described in document D3 qualifies as a filter appropriate to the detection of low concentrations of microorganisms, such as those that may be contained as contaminants in a mammalian cell fermenter.

25. However, as indicated in point 21 supra, the skilled person would have found no guidance at all in the available state of the art to combine one or more detergents with an osmotic shock and would not have been aware that such a combination is synergistic. Therefore, in the light of the prior art on file, the board considers that the skilled person would not have arrived at the method of claim 1 in an obvious manner.

26. Thus, the board concludes that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the auxiliary request involves an inventive step. The same conclusion applies to the subject-matter of dependent claims 2 to 8. Therefore, the auxiliary request complies with Article 56 EPC 1973.

Concluding remark

27. Since the auxiliary request meets the requirements of the EPC, it forms the basis for the grant of a patent.

Adaptation of the description

28. At the oral proceedings, the appellant adapted the description to the auxiliary request. The board is satisfied that the description was satisfactorily amended in accordance with the EPC.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the examining division with the order to grant a patent in the following version:

Claims Nos.: 1 to 8 according to the auxiliary request, filed during the oral proceedings

Description pages: 1 to 7, filed during the oral proceedings.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility
OSZAR »